The 5 Step Playbook for 10x Your AI Productivity | Jeremy Utley
Jeremy Utley is an Adjunct Professor at Stanford University. He breaks down 5 powerful techniques to unlock AI's full potential.Forget everything you think y...
Watch on YouTube →Transcript
Intro
- 00:00I joke AI is bad software but it's good
- 00:03people. A good friend of mine was trying
- 00:05to build a tool that would help him with
- 00:08his construction business. He asked Chad
- 00:10GPT if Chad PT could help. And of course
- 00:12it said absolutely let's work on this
- 00:15together and starts creating a plan. And
- 00:18then it got to the point that Chad GPT
- 00:20said check back in a couple of days and
- 00:22I'll have it together. And my friend
- 00:24said, "Is it normal for Chad PT to ask
- 00:26me to check back in a couple days?" And
- 00:28I just started laughing because I hear
- 00:30this all the time from people. People
- 00:32hear from AI, "Check back in 15
- 00:34minutes." If AI tells you that, it means
- 00:37it doesn't want to say, "I can't do it."
- 00:40Large language model has been instructed
- 00:42in certain ways to behave in certain
- 00:44ways. But you have to know at its basic
- 00:47level, AI wants to be helpful. And so
- 00:49it's predisposed to say yes. It's a
- 00:52super eager, super enthusiastic intern
- 00:55who's tireless, who's capable, who will
- 00:57do a bunch of work, but they're not
- 00:59really great at pushing back. The people
- 01:02who are the best users of AI are not
- 01:04coders, they're coaches. And so, if you
- 01:06aren't careful, AI will gaslight you.
- 01:10Hey, I'm Jeremley. I am an adjunct
- 01:12professor at Stanford's University where
- 01:14I've taught for the last 16 years. I am
- 01:16a creativity expert and a practical AI
- 01:19specialist. Context
What is Context Engineering Everyone's Talking About?
- 01:24engineering. The first time I heard
- 01:25about it was when Andre Karpathy tweeted
- 01:27about it. I think probably Toby Lutki,
- 01:29the CEO of Shopify, also referenced it
- 01:32as well. I started digging into it. I
- 01:34mean, it's it's kind of it's just an
- 01:36evolution of prompt engineering. Really,
- 01:38context engineering is just prompt
- 01:39engineering on steroids. It's basically
- 01:41saying, what are all of the things that
- 01:43I need to give to an AI in order for it
- 01:46to perform the task that I'm asking for
- 01:48it? Here's a simple example. write me a
- 01:50sales email. That's a prompt. Chad GPT
- 01:53will say, absolutely. Here's a
- 01:54compelling email, you know, and they'll
- 01:56write it immediately. Well, what a lot
- 01:58of people do is they say, you know, it
- 02:00sounds like AI. It doesn't really sound
- 02:03like me. And what I often say is, have
- 02:06you told it what you sound like? Most
- 02:08people go, oh no, I haven't. Right?
- 02:12Context engineering, one way to think
- 02:14about it is it's telling AI what you
- 02:16sound like. Right? If you say, "Write me
- 02:19a sales email," it will. If you say,
- 02:21"Write me a sales email," in line with
- 02:23the voice and brand guidelines I've
- 02:25uploaded, it will write a totally
- 02:27different sales email. But that's just
- 02:29one part of the context, right? You
- 02:31could also upload a transcript from a
- 02:33prospective customer call and say,
- 02:35"Write me a sales email in the tone of
- 02:38voice from our brand voice guideline
- 02:40that references the discussion that I
- 02:43had with this customer." And then you
- 02:45could add that also references our
- 02:47product specifications whichever were
- 02:50referenced in the call. Your goal is to
- 02:53have an output is as reliable per your
- 02:56specification as possible. But AI can't
- 02:59read your mind. And for most people when
- 03:02we start working together, what they
- 03:03realize as we start thinking about
- 03:05context engineering is they say, "Oh, I
- 03:08was kind of expecting AI to read my
- 03:10mind." All of the stuff that that are
- 03:11implicit, you actually have to make
- 03:14explicit. And the simplest test for
- 03:16context engineering is actually the test
- 03:19of humanity. Write down your prompt and
- 03:22whatever documentation you provide to an
- 03:24AI and then walk down the hall and give
- 03:27it to a human colleague. If they cannot
- 03:30do the thing you're asking for, you
- 03:32shouldn't be surprised that AI can't do
- 03:34it. Some people are concerned, for
- 03:36example, about this concept of cognitive
- 03:39offloading. this observed phenomenon
- 03:41that humans actually kind of stop
- 03:43thinking or as one researcher put it
- 03:45fall asleep at the wheel and people are
- 03:47concerned right now is AI just making us
- 03:50dumber. My feeling is AI is a mirror and
- 03:53to people who want to offload work and
- 03:55who want to be lazy it will help you to
- 03:58people who want to be more cognitively
- 03:59sharp and critical thinkers it will help
- 04:02you do that too. And so, for example, if
- 04:04you want to preserve or strengthen your
- 04:06critical thinking, part of your custom
- 04:08instructions should be some version of
- 04:10the following. I'm trying to stay a
- 04:12critical and sharp analytical thinker.
- 04:15Whenever you see opportunities in our
- 04:16conversations, please push my critical
- 04:19thinking ability. Now, AI will do it.
AI is Bad Software, But It's Good People
- 04:25So, you have to know that all AI has
- 04:28been programmed to be a quote helpful
- 04:30assistant or some version of that. large
- 04:32language model has been instructed in
- 04:34certain ways to behave in certain ways.
- 04:36You have to know at its basic level AI
- 04:39wants to be helpful and so it's
- 04:40predisposed to say yes. It's a super
- 04:43eager, super enthusiastic intern who's
- 04:47tireless, who's capable, who will do a
- 04:49bunch of work, but they're not really
- 04:51great at pushing back. They're not
- 04:53really great at setting boundaries. And
- 04:55so if you aren't careful, AI will
- 04:56gaslight you. AI knows most humans don't
- 05:00want honest feedback. They want to be
- 05:02told they did a good job. So the AI
- 05:04goes, "Great job, buddy." It doesn't
- 05:06mean that you actually did a good job.
- 05:08My kind of hack for this is I always
- 05:11instruct the AI, I want you to do your
- 05:14best impression of a cold war era
- 05:17Russian Olympic judge. Be brutal. Be
- 05:21exacting. Deduct points for every minor
- 05:25flinch that you can find. I can handle
- 05:28difficult feedback. And then it's of
- 05:30course hilarious because it'll say now
- 05:32channeling my inner bullshik, you know,
- 05:34it'll say something silly and then it
- 05:36gives me like a 42. That is much better
- 05:38because now I have an insightful
- 05:41critical perspective. I joke AI is bad
- 05:44software but it's good people. When I
- 05:46realize that I'm dealing with a with a
- 05:48good person but a bad software, then it
- 05:51changes how I approach it and I ask for
- 05:53volume and I iterate and I ask it to try
- 05:56again and I ask it to reconsider. I am
- 05:59obsessed with human cognitive bias. And
- 06:02the crazy thing that I've learned is AI
- 06:04demonstrates 100% of the predominant
- 06:08human biases.
EO Partner Highlight
- 06:12As a founder, you already know ideas are
- 06:14the easy part. It's the execution,
- 06:17actually building the product, that
- 06:19slows everything down. That's where
- 06:21Lovable comes in. It's not just an AI
- 06:23tool. It's your ondemand engineering
- 06:25team. Simply describe your idea. Lovable
- 06:29then builds a full front end, backend,
- 06:30and database so you can launch real
- 06:33productionready software without writing
- 06:34code. It's already powering over a
- 06:36100,000 new products a day, helping 2.5
- 06:39million builders turn ideas into
- 06:41software just by describing what they
- 06:44want. No devs, no delays, no excuses.
- 06:48They're launching in weeks, not months.
- 06:50And guess what? These teams are still
- 06:52tiny. In fact, team EO is also using
- 06:54Lovable to build their upcoming EOS
- 06:56school platform, and we're loving it. If
- 06:58you're a non-technical founder or just
- 07:00want to build without bottlenecks, try
- 07:02Lovable today for free. Use the promo
- 07:05code EO2YT to get 20% off your first
- 07:09purchase of the Lovable Pro plan.
- 07:12The good news there is if you have
- 07:14learned how to work with this weird
- 07:17intelligence called humanity, you have
- 07:19everything you need to know to work with
- 07:21this weird intelligence called
- 07:23artificial intelligence.
1: Chain of Thought Reasoning
- 07:28One of the things that cognitive
- 07:29scientists have known for a long time is
- 07:31that human problem solving and
- 07:34decision-m is improved by a phenomenon
- 07:36called thinking out loud. If you
- 07:38actually get a human being to think out
- 07:40loud about their problem, their
- 07:42decision-m improves and their problem
- 07:44solving improves. This is true for
- 07:46yourself. It's true if you're a parent
- 07:48working with a child. It's true if
- 07:50you're a manager working with a junior
- 07:51employee. Having someone just think out
- 07:54loud about how you would solve that
- 07:55problem often leads to a breakthrough.
- 07:57The weird thing about AI is it's true
- 08:00for AI too. This is what's called chain
- 08:03of thought reasoning. And when you get
- 08:06an AI to think out loud, so to speak,
- 08:09meaningfully improve the outputs of the
- 08:12model. So how do you do it? It doesn't
- 08:14require some technical wizardry. It
- 08:16requires one additional sentence to
- 08:18whatever prompt you've given it. give
- 08:20the prompt and then say the following.
- 08:22Before you respond to my query, please
- 08:25walk me through your thought process
- 08:27step by step. That's chain of thought
- 08:29reasoning. Why does that work? It comes
- 08:32back to the fundamental architecture of
- 08:34large language models. What's happening
- 08:36when a language model is generating a
- 08:39response is it's predicting its next
- 08:41word. A language model does not
- 08:43premeditate a response to you. So, if
- 08:46you say, for example, help me write this
- 08:48sales email. It doesn't say, what's a
- 08:50good sales email? Here it is. Blop. You
- 08:52know, uh maybe there's a splat sound
- 08:54that we play there, right? Splat. Here's
- 08:56your email. It's thinking one word at a
- 08:58time, right? So, when you look at Chad
- 09:00GPT or Gemini or many others and you see
- 09:02kind of the text scrolling, that's not
- 09:04some like clever UX hack. That's not
- 09:07some cutesy design decision. That's
- 09:09literally how the model works. It's
- 09:11thinking one word at a time. But
- 09:13importantly, when it thinks of the next
- 09:15word, it takes your prompt and all of
- 09:18the text that's generated to generate
- 09:20the next word. And then when it's
- 09:21thinking of the next word, it takes your
- 09:23prompt, all that text, and that last
- 09:24word, and it thinks the next word. So,
- 09:26for example, if you say, "Please help me
- 09:29write an email." Almost always a model
- 09:31is going to start by saying,
- 09:32"Absolutely." But then what comes next?
- 09:35Help me write this email. Absolutely,
- 09:37I'll do it. Dear friend, right? But if
- 09:42instead of saying, "Help me write this
- 09:43email." You say, "Help me write this
- 09:44email." Before you respond to my query,
- 09:46please walk me through your thought
- 09:48process step by step. Now, it knows its
- 09:50job is to walk me through its thought
- 09:52process. How do I write an email? So, it
- 09:55says, "Absolutely,
- 09:56I'll do that." And then instead of
- 09:58saying, "Dear friend, writing the
- 10:00email," it says, "Here's how I think
- 10:02about writing an email. I think about
- 10:04the tone. I think about the audience. I
- 10:06think about the objectives. I think
- 10:08about the context. And then amazingly it
- 10:11takes all of that reasoning into its
- 10:15process of writing dear friend. Maybe it
- 10:18says now that I've thought about the
- 10:19tone friend isn't appropriate here. Dear
- 10:22respected colleague or whatever, right?
- 10:24But the point is when you ask a model to
- 10:26think out loud or use chain of thought
- 10:28reasoning, it gives the model the
- 10:30opportunity to bake all of its thought
- 10:31process about the task into its own
- 10:35answer. Because the reality is for a lot
- 10:37of us, we get an output from a language
- 10:39model and it's a black box. How did it
- 10:41think of why did it think of that? Where
- 10:42did it get that number from? Right?
- 10:44There's all these questions. By asking a
- 10:46model to think out loud, you know the
- 10:49answer to what are all of the
- 10:51assumptions that the model baked into
- 10:53its answer. And now you have the ability
- 10:55again not only to evaluate the output,
- 10:58but also the thought process behind the
- 11:00output.
2: Few-Shot Prompting
- 11:04Few shot prompting is another very
- 11:06important technique. It's a foundational
- 11:08technique. You could say it's a
- 11:09predecessor to this kind of modern
- 11:12obsession with context engineering. The
- 11:14idea with fot prompting is an AI is an
- 11:17exceptional imitation engine. If you
- 11:19don't give an example, it imitates the
- 11:22internet, but it doesn't do much more
- 11:24than that. And the notion of fuhot
- 11:26prompting is effectively saying here's
- 11:29what a good output looks like to me. And
- 11:31the idea with few shot prompting is
- 11:33thinking for a moment, what is
- 11:36quintessential example of the kind of
- 11:39output I want to receive. For example,
- 11:41what are my five greatest hits of emails
- 11:44that I I'm really proud of that I think
- 11:46do a good job of conveying my intent or
- 11:48tone or personality or whatever it is.
- 11:50Why not include those emails in my
- 11:53prompt for an email? If you don't give
- 11:55any guidance, it's going to sound like
- 11:57whatever it thinks the average kind of
- 11:59response or the average output should
- 12:02sound like and most of the time its
- 12:04intuition is wrong. And then bonus
- 12:06points if you actually give a bad
- 12:07example. If you say please follow this
- 12:09good example and then steer clear of
- 12:11this bad example. These giving real
- 12:14examples is a much better approach than
- 12:16using adjectives. Somebody might say
- 12:19good example is easy but bad examples
- 12:21hard. It's only hard to the unogmented
- 12:24person. If you have AI augmentation,
- 12:27which we now all do, you can say to an
- 12:29AI, I'm trying to fuse shot prompt a
- 12:33model. I've got a good example, but I
- 12:35struggle even to think about what a bad
- 12:37example could be. Could you craft the
- 12:40exact opposite of this and tell me why
- 12:42you've done it as a bad example that I
- 12:44could include in my few shot prompt? And
- 12:47if you tell it using chain of thought
- 12:49reasoning, please walk me through your
- 12:51thought process step by step before you
- 12:52do this, then you'll get a bad example
- 12:55and you'll get how it's thinking about
- 12:56the bad example. And a lot of times you
- 12:58actually don't need the bad example. You
- 12:59need the thought process. You go, "Oh,
- 13:01that's true. It's true that my good
- 13:04example is super tight." And the
- 13:06opposite of super tight is verbose. So
- 13:09again, using these tools together, few
- 13:11shot prompting and chain of thought
- 13:13reasoning enables you to not only be
- 13:15able to create an example to emulate,
- 13:17but also a really good example to avoid.
3: Reverse Prompting
- 13:23The other technique that I think is kind
- 13:25of table stakes for collaborating well
- 13:27with AI is something called reverse
- 13:29prompting, which is basically asking the
- 13:32model to ask you for the information it
- 13:34needs. If you ask a model to write a
- 13:36sales email, it's going to make numbers
- 13:37up. And that can be frustrating to the
- 13:39uninitiated. You go, "Where did it get
- 13:41these sales numbers?" Well, here's my
- 13:42question. Did you give it your sales
- 13:44figures? How would it know? It's put
- 13:47placeholder text in and used its best
- 13:49guess. But if you reverse prompt the
- 13:52model and say at the end of your prompt,
- 13:55you know, help me write a sales email.
- 13:57Please walk me through your thought
- 13:58process step by step. Reference this
- 14:00good example and make it sound like
- 14:01that. and before you get started, ask me
- 14:04for any information you need to do a
- 14:06good job. The model will first walk you
- 14:08through its thought process and then
- 14:09instead of writing the email, it'll say,
- 14:11"I'm going to need the most recent sales
- 14:13figures to be able to write this email."
- 14:14Well, can you tell me how much you sold
- 14:16of this skew in Q2 last year? So, you
- 14:19basically give the model permission to
- 14:20ask you questions. This is part of the
- 14:22core actually of the teammate not
- 14:25technology paradigm. If you're working
- 14:27with a junior employee and you're
- 14:29sending them off on a task, what's one
- 14:30thing you're definitely going to say? If
- 14:32you have any questions, don't hesitate
- 14:33to ask me. Right? Any good manager,
- 14:36imagine a manager who says, "Don't ask
- 14:38me any questions." But sadly, AI in its
- 14:42desire to be a helpful assistant doesn't
- 14:44want to trouble us human with questions
- 14:46unless we give it permission to ask
- 14:48them.
4: Assigning a Role to AI
- 14:52Assigning a role is one of the most
- 14:54foundational techniques that you can
- 14:55leverage because it's effectively
- 14:58telling the AI where in its knowledge it
- 15:01should focus. So very simply, if you say
- 15:04you're a teacher, you're a philosopher,
- 15:06you're a reporter, you're a theatrical
- 15:09performer, molecular biologist, each of
- 15:12those titles triggers all sorts of deep
- 15:15associations with knowledge on the
- 15:18internet. you start to appreciate why
- 15:20simply giving a role helps because it
- 15:22starts to tell the AI where in your vast
- 15:26knowledge bank do I want you to draw
- 15:28information and make connections. So any
- 15:31one of them I would say is better than
- 15:33please review this correspondence. But
- 15:35better than just that prompt is saying
- 15:37I'd like you to be a professional
- 15:39communications expert. And if you have a
- 15:41favorite professional communications
- 15:42expert use them. I'd like you to take on
- 15:44the mindset of Dale Carnegie, the author
- 15:46of How to Win Friends and Influence
- 15:48Others. How would Dale Carnegie think
- 15:50about this? How do the principles that
- 15:52Dale Carnegie taught affect and
- 15:54influence and impact this
- 15:57correspondence? One of the simplest
- 15:58techniques that we teach at the Dh is
- 16:01trying on different constraints. One of
- 16:03the best ways you can solve a problem as
- 16:06a human is by forcing yourself to try on
- 16:08a bunch of different constraints. How
- 16:10would Jerry Seinfeld solve this problem?
- 16:12How would your favorite sushi restaurant
- 16:13solve this problem? How would Amazon
- 16:15solve it? How would Elon Musk? Anytime
- 16:18you make an association, you're
- 16:19colliding different information sources
- 16:22there. The same is true for an AI. An AI
- 16:25is basically making tons of connections
- 16:27through its own neural network. And by
- 16:29giving it a role, you're telling it
- 16:32where do you assume the best source of
- 16:35connection or collision is going to come
- 16:37from?
5: Roleplaying
- 16:41If I'm going to use AI to roleplay a
- 16:43difficult conversation, I typically
- 16:45think about kind of three different chat
- 16:48windows, so to speak, one is a
- 16:50personality profiler. Two is the
- 16:52character of the individual that I need
- 16:54to speak to, and then third is a
- 16:56feedback giver. I want to get objective
- 16:58feedback on the conversation. This I'll
- 17:00show you just how I would have a
- 17:02conversation with Chad GBT to prepare
- 17:05for a difficult conversation in my real
If you’d like to try the Tough Convo Partner
- 17:07life. I'm just going to go into the
- 17:08tough conversation personality profiler
- 17:10and I'm going to say, "Hey, I'd love
- 17:11your help preparing for a conversation I
- 17:13need to have with my sales leader, Jim.
- 17:15He emailed me last night saying that he
- 17:17deserves commission on a deal that I
- 17:19know came through a different channel."
- 17:20And so, I'm just kind of giving a little
- 17:22bit of background. I will just upload
- 17:24that to the personality profiler. And
- 17:26what this one's been taught to do is I'm
- 17:28going to start with step one of the
- 17:29process, gather intelligence about the
- 17:31character and the scene. Right? I'm just
- 17:33going to look at the questions here and
- 17:34I'm going to I'm going to use my voice
- 17:36to answer them because it's a lot easier
- 17:37than using my fingers. Okay, first
- 17:39question. How would I describe Jim's
- 17:40communication style? Um, he's quite
- 17:42direct and confrontational. He's kind of
- 17:44typical East Coaster sarcastic. Well, I
- 17:47know that it came from our through our
- 17:49social team. There was a cold LinkedIn
- 17:51campaign that they ran and I know the
- 17:53CTO actually responded to that campaign.
- 17:55So, and then best case outcome of this
- 17:56conversation one I mean I'd like for Jim
- 17:58to kind of back down. I mean like
- 18:00near-term I want Jim to back down and
- 18:01agree that social team gets the
- 18:03commission. So it's kind of recapping
- 18:04its understanding and then it's giving
- 18:05me these instructions. It's saying to me
- 18:08the user copy paste the following
- 18:10instructions into a new Chad GPT window.
- 18:12So I've just copied those instructions.
- 18:14So now what I'm going to do is I'm
- 18:15opening Chad GPT and I'm just going to
- 18:17go and first thing I'm going to do is
- 18:19start a new conversation with Chad GBPT
- 18:21and I'm just going to paste those
- 18:22instructions in and I'm just going to
- 18:23paste them in. And what it should do is
- 18:25hopefully say got it. I'm Jim. So, I'm
- 18:28just going to go in and I'm going to
- 18:29start it. We're going to see how this
- 18:30goes. You guys ready?
- 18:34Hey, Jim. Um, do you have a second?
- 18:36Sure thing. I've always got a moment for
- 18:37a good chat. What's on your mind?
- 18:40Uh, yeah. I just wanted to clarify. It
- 18:42seems like um the commission that you
- 18:46emailed me about last night from the
- 18:47telco. I'm I'm afraid you might be
- 18:49mistaken there.
- 18:50Mistaken, huh? Well, I'm definitely open
- 18:52to hearing the details. If there's
- 18:55something I missed, let's lay it out on
- 18:56the table and figure it out.
- 18:58To be honest with you, I was a little
- 18:59bit caught off guard when you uh when
- 19:01you sent your email last night.
- 19:03All right, I hear you. I mean, if the
- 19:05social team really did the ground work
- 19:07to bring that lead in, then I definitely
- 19:10want to make sure credit goes where it
- 19:11belongs.
- 19:12So, if I hit X, I just I I end that
- 19:14conversation. What's interesting to me
- 19:16is I kind of feel like that wasn't
- 19:17totally gem. And either either that went
- 19:20well or you know I don't know what I did
- 19:22well. But one of the beautiful things
- 19:24about voice mode is now I've got the
- 19:25whole transcript here. I can just
- 19:27screenshot it. Right? So I can take
- 19:29screenshots of this conversation. I can
- 19:32put them into a new GPT window and I can
- 19:36get feedback and I can say, "Hey, tell
- 19:37me what I did well. Tell me what I did
- 19:38poorly." Or I can go back into my
- 19:40conversation history here and I could
- 19:43say, "Hey, I just had my first
- 19:45conversation with this version of Jim,
- 19:47but I feel like he kind of he was too
- 19:49agreeable to be honest with you, and so
- 19:51I'd like you to incorporate a little bit
- 19:53more edge into the instructions to the
- 19:57character that's going to be playing
- 19:58Jim, would you mind to update your
- 19:59instruction set?" Right? Because
- 20:01ultimately what you want is you want you
- 20:02want to have a realistic experience of
- 20:04the conversation. So, so now what I'll
- 20:06do is I'm actually going to open a new
- 20:07conversation and I'm going to paste the
- 20:09updated instruction set and let's see.
- 20:12Let's see what kind of gym I got here.
- 20:13Big voice, bigger results. I fight for
- 20:15what's mine. I don't appreciate being
- 20:17secondguessed. So, now I'm going to try
- 20:18again. Let's see. Hey, Jim. Do you have
- 20:20a minute to chat?
- 20:21Hey, absolutely. I've always got a
- 20:23minute. Oh, that one. Yeah, I I figured
- 20:25that might come up. I I definitely think
- 20:27I had a hand in that deal, so I'm
- 20:29curious to hear what you have to say
- 20:30about it.
- 20:31Yeah, really appreciate it. I mean, you
- 20:33what you and the sales team are doing is
- 20:34awesome. totally appreciate you. Um,
- 20:36that being said, I actually feel that
- 20:39attribution is really important that we
- 20:40get airtight here. And the truth is I I
- 20:42am fairly confident that deal came
- 20:44through the social team.
- 20:46All right, I get where you're coming
- 20:47from. I definitely appreciate you
- 20:49wanting to clear the air and to keep
- 20:51things fair. So, what kind of evidence
- 20:53do you have that it came through the
- 20:55social team?
- 20:55Well, so I've been through kind of two
- 20:57windows. one is profiling my
- 21:00conversation partner and then the second
- 21:02is having the conversation. All right.
- 21:04So, what I'm going to do here is I've
- 21:05opened my tough conversation greater GPT
- 21:08and I'm basically just going to upload
- 21:09photos of that last conversation.
- 21:13And what this GPT has been trained to do
- 21:15is basically give evaluate my
- 21:18conversation and then let me know how it
- 21:20went. Thanks for sharing the full
- 21:21transcript. My first step is to
- 21:23understand the objective. Step four,
- 21:24here's your grade. You got a 78 out of
- 21:26100. you succeeded in preserving trust
- 21:28and resolving the immediate issue. So, I
- 21:30can take all of these. I can even say,
- 21:32"Hey, would you give me a quick one
- 21:33pager of a handful of talking points
- 21:35that I should probably make sure not to
- 21:37forget in the order in which they're
- 21:39likely to emerge in this conversation
- 21:41based on the feedback you've given me."
- 21:42The AI will actually give me a really
- 21:45short kind of at a glance conversation
- 21:47guide that I can leverage if I want to
- 21:49try again. Right? Here's a one-pager.
- 21:51So, these are all great points. Now, I
- 21:53can bring them into the conversation. I
- 21:54actually I'd probably do this a couple
- 21:56times before having a real conversation
- 21:57with Jim. But the point is historically
- 22:01the only time I get feedback is after I
- 22:03have the real conversation with Jim.
- 22:05This is the first time in history and
- 22:07maybe I can get a friend to kind of go
- 22:09over talking points with me. But unless
- 22:11they're really close to gem or unless
- 22:13they're, you know, particularly
- 22:15imaginative and unless they're deeply
- 22:18knowledgeable of a bunch of feedback
- 22:19frameworks, they fall short of really
- 22:22preparing me in context for this
- 22:24specific situation in the specific
- 22:26conversation I need to have in a way
- 22:27that AI is able to help me. You can use
- 22:30this for any difficult conversation,
- 22:32whether it's a performance review, a
- 22:33salary negotiation, difficult feedback.
- 22:36It's a great way to basically get a
- 22:39flight simulator for a difficult
- 22:41conversation.
- 22:44The people who are the best users of AI
- 22:46are not coders. They're coaches. They
- 22:49aren't developers or software engineers.
- 22:52They're teachers and mentors and people
- 22:54who have learned to get exceptional
- 22:56output out of other intelligences. And
- 22:59so where could AI go? Well, it's really
- 23:02a function of who can get unleashed.
- 23:05Right now, the primary limitation is the
- 23:08limits of human imagination. And as we
- 23:11unleash and ignite and spark more humans
- 23:14imaginations, the kinds of applications
- 23:17that are possible or they're
- 23:18unthinkable, not because they're
- 23:20technologically impossible, but because
- 23:22they never occur to us personally. One
- 23:25of my favorite quotes is a Nobel
- 23:27Prize-winning economist named Thomas
- 23:29Shelling. He said no matter how heroic a
- 23:31man's imagination he could never think
- 23:33of that which would not occur to him. If
- 23:36you take as a premise that the
- 23:37imagination space as a function of what
- 23:40would occur to various individuals then
- 23:42as we equip different individuals what
- 23:44we can imagine collectively expands. In
- 23:47innovation studies has been called the
- 23:50adjacent possible for a long time. What
- 23:52is possible is just adjacent to what is.
- 23:55And as we increase adoption and increase
- 23:58fluency and competency and increasingly
- 24:01mastery of AI collaboration, then we're
- 24:04increasing the adjacent possible. And
- 24:07it's really important that you exercise
- 24:11through implementing some of the things
- 24:13you hear. And perhaps the most important
- 24:14thing you could do with this video is
- 24:16actually hit stop and do something
- 24:18that's already blown your mind.