What's Actually Holding Humanoid Robots Back Isn't the AI | Andrew Kang, RoboStrategy
Andrew Kang, CEO of RoboStrategy and an early investor in Figure AI, breaks down why he's betting humanoid robots become a tens-of-trillions-dollar market, a...
Watch on YouTube →Transcript
Intro
- 00:01The amazing thing about the Figure AI
- 00:02live stream was it showed that this is
- 00:05real. It's not a video where they took a
- 00:07hundred attempts at [music] doing a task
- 00:09and they showed the best one. This was a
- 00:11live stream that went on for 8 or 10
- 00:13hours and it ended up going on for 8
- 00:15days. What was funny was that the human
- 00:17actually won. It won by a little bit,
- 00:19but you know, at the end of the day, the
- 00:20intern that was doing the challenge, his
- 00:22hands were blistered. He was not having
- 00:24a lot of fun. It was exhausting. It's
- 00:26not something that he'd probably want to
- 00:27do again. I actually think it's closer
- 00:29to something like two [music] to three
- 00:30years where humanoid intelligence, robot
- 00:32intelligence gets good enough to do most
- 00:34of the tasks that we need on on a daily
- 00:36basis. [music] This is a technological
- 00:38revolution that is different because it
- 00:40turns physical labor into in a product
- 00:42that almost anybody can access. Hey
- 00:45guys, I'm Andrew. I'm the CEO of Robo
- 00:47Strategy. Robo Strategy is one of the
- 00:49first publicly listed venture funds on
- 00:51NASDAQ and we are the only publicly
- 00:54listed venture fund that is exclusively
- 00:56focused on investing in robotics and
- 00:58physical AI. We're invested in quite a
- 01:00few robotics companies, Frager AI,
- 01:02Uptronic, Dino Robotics. We also have
- 01:04Centerbots in the portfolio. They build
- 01:06industrial arms, cobots, and also
- 01:08companies like Path Robotics that focus
- 01:10on specific tasks like welding.
The Bet: All in on Figure AI and the full-stack future
- 01:16One of the largest investments that we
- 01:17had ever made into the company Figure
- 01:19AI, it wasn't a consensus investment
- 01:21because [music]
- 01:22everyone that we had asked, the other
- 01:23venture investors that were more
- 01:25familiar with investing in inferentiary
- 01:27technology, they didn't really believe
- 01:29that humanoid robotics was going to work
- 01:31[music] anytime soon or they perceived
- 01:32there was going to be a lot of risks.
- 01:34They saw that humanoids or uh companies
- 01:37building [music] the robotic space had
- 01:38never produced big venture scale
- 01:40outcomes as opposed to understanding the
- 01:44[music] context that things were
- 01:45changing and that technology for
- 01:47robotics was going to be accelerating
- 01:49and moving at a different pace than it
- 01:50[music] was before. And so that's why we
- 01:52really decided at that point to pivot,
- 01:54you know, our entire company into
- 01:56focusing on investing in robotics. It's
- 01:58funny because when I went and [music]
- 02:00invested in Figer for the first time, I
- 02:02had never actually been to their
- 02:03facility. I watched every single video I
- 02:05could of Brett of Figure um and you know
- 02:09all the work that they had done for
- 02:10previous companies as well. Just kind
- 02:12[music] of doing our research on the
- 02:13team, the founder, it was quite clear
- 02:16that this is [music] one of the few
- 02:17teams that were able to do it. They had
- 02:19the background in hardware engineering.
- 02:21They had the background in robot
- 02:22learning. They had the background in all
- 02:24these really niche fields like hand
- 02:26engineering or robot controls and
- 02:28[music] fleet management. Looking at all
- 02:30the competitors and all the other
- 02:31players in the space, it was pretty
- 02:32clear that they were one of the top
- 02:34teams to be able to to accomplish a
- 02:35task. We're not the type of investors to
- 02:37be very dogmatic. When we believe one
- 02:40thing, never change our minds. High
- 02:42conviction, strong beliefs loosely held.
- 02:45Um, but we're always trying to
- 02:47re-evaluate our beliefs of the world.
- 02:50And [music] if there's important
- 02:51information that comes up to lead us to
- 02:53believe we're wrong, then we're happy to
- 02:55change our minds. And it's important for
- 02:57us to always track the pace of
- 02:59development across [music] all robotics
- 03:00companies, not just the ones that we're
- 03:02invested in, so that we can understand
- 03:04how are the different companies stacking
- 03:05up against each other. How is the field
- 03:07developing across all the different
- 03:09characteristics that we look for
- 03:10robotics companies, right? How are
- 03:12different players scaling up their robot
- 03:14fleet? um how are they conducting robot
- 03:16learning research? You know, what are
- 03:18they doing on the hardware development
- 03:19side? And from all those kind of points
- 03:22of view, we still believe Figure is one
- 03:24of the top companies. Really, it's it's
- 03:26them in and Tesla Optimus at the top.
- 03:29We're really excited about the
- 03:30vertically integrated robotics
- 03:32companies. These are the companies that
- 03:34we're investing in the most. And these
- 03:36are companies that are not just building
- 03:37their own robot intelligence, but
- 03:39they're building the hardware. uh
- 03:41they're doing the deployments and
- 03:42they're also uh scaling up their own
- 03:44manufacturing capabilities. When we
- 03:46think about why these [music] companies
- 03:48exist in the first place is because when
- 03:51you're training the robots, it also
- 03:52makes sense to be able to, you know,
- 03:54have built the robot hardware yourself
- 03:55[music]
- 03:56so that they're co-optimized for each
- 03:58other. Maybe a robot that has better
- 04:00torque sensing within its joints uh is
- 04:03able to be better modeled in simulation
- 04:05[music]
- 04:06or you can build a model that
- 04:08incorporates that type of data that
- 04:10you're capturing. So there's a lot of
- 04:11advantages in [music] building these
- 04:13systems in parallel with each other um
- 04:15because it makes the training more
- 04:16efficient, research more efficient. At
- 04:18the end of the day, the robots are going
- 04:20to be more performant [music] as well.
- 04:21One of the key data pieces that are
- 04:24required for robot learning development
- 04:26is the actual robot data itself. Robots
- 04:29that are either doing a specific task
- 04:31running a model or robots that are
- 04:33controlled using teleaoperation to
- 04:35collect the data. One of the ways that
- 04:37you can think of this is if you were
- 04:39transformed into the body of somebody
- 04:41that was seven foot tall, you probably
- 04:43would have be a little bit awkward in
- 04:45interacting with the world around you as
- 04:47opposed to you continuing to interact
- 04:49with the world around you in your
- 04:51current body in your current physical
- 04:52form because that's the body that you're
- 04:54used to. And so having that embodiment
- 04:57specific data is going to create more
- 05:00effective models. and to be able to
- 05:02collect a lot of embodiment specific
- 05:03data, [music]
- 05:04you're also going to need need a lot of
- 05:05robots. That is one of the bottlenecks
- 05:07that the industry is currently working
- 05:08through right now is if you're trying to
- 05:10buy 100 robots or a thousand robots.
- 05:13That's going to be pretty tough. You
- 05:14[music] can't get that in a day. You
- 05:16need to make those orders ahead of time
- 05:17and it's going to take time to produce
- 05:19those robots. And so, if I have my own
- 05:22manufacturing facility, I can earmark
- 05:24all those robots just for the sole
- 05:25purpose of collecting data myself. And
- 05:28that's what companies like Figure
- 05:29[music] are doing, what companies like
- 05:30Tesla Optimist are doing, Electronic as
- 05:33well. So I'm not going to have a
- 05:34bottleneck because I don't have to worry
- 05:36about say a robot company supplier in
- 05:38China where I'm getting my [music]
- 05:40robots from just not having enough
- 05:42available because demand has
- 05:44skyrocketed. And that's what you've seen
- 05:45with GPUs or you know other components
- 05:48of the supply [music] chain is that
- 05:49things demand for a lot of these items
- 05:51are scaling up really really quickly and
- 05:53it's hard for these supply chain vendors
- 05:55to be able to produce them enough to
- 05:57fill that demand.
The Future: How far humanoids actually go
- 06:03I think the market for humanoid robotics
- 06:04is going to be in the tens of trillions.
- 06:06It's a crazy number. I think the way
- 06:08that you can get there is you can take
- 06:10two views. You can take the top down
- 06:12view, which is you just look at all of
- 06:14the market for physical labor in the
- 06:16world, and that's a $50 trillion market,
- 06:18but it's it's a little bit hard to
- 06:19conceptualize. And so the way that we
- 06:21thought about it was imagine one
- 06:23humanoid. It might be sold or it might
- 06:25be leased for $50,000. That's that's a
- 06:27pretty good price because a laborer in
- 06:29the US or physical work in the US, you
- 06:32have to pay maybe $50,000 a year when
- 06:34you're considering all of the benefits
- 06:36and and all- in costs or sometimes more
- 06:38than that. And then you take that
- 06:39$50,000 and you multiply it by h 100,000
- 06:42just as a starting point. That number is
- 06:44already $5 billion. Company that's
- 06:46making $5 billion a year is is a pretty
- 06:48sizable company. But then right you just
- 06:50scale it but up by 10 [music] and you
- 06:52say what if I have a company that sells
- 06:54a million humanoids per year. It's $50
- 06:56billion. We make billions of cell phones
- 06:59per year. We [music] make hundreds of
- 07:00millions of cars and PCs. And so I think
- 07:03we're probably going to make a lot more
- 07:04humanoids. And so you can really clearly
- 07:06see that there's a [music] there's a
- 07:08trajectory for this industry for
- 07:10humanoid robots to get to trillions of
- 07:11dollars of revenue. And that would imply
- 07:14tens of trillions of market cap. And
- 07:16that's almost an underestimate because
- 07:18when we start making labor more abundant
- 07:21uh more affordable then it expands the
- 07:24market as well. We can start sending
- 07:25robots to space. We can start sending
- 07:27robots to build more data centers.
- 07:28Right? That is kind of a key constraint
- 07:30for the data center buildout right now.
- 07:32It's not the things that go into making
- 07:34them. It's the the labor. It's the
- 07:36people that are actually putting things
- 07:37together, doing the plumbing,
- 07:38electricity. I actually think it's
- 07:40closer to something like 2 to 3 years
- 07:42where humanoid intelligence, robot
- 07:44intelligence gets good enough to do most
- 07:46of the tasks that we need on on a daily
- 07:48basis. So, I think you could almost
- 07:49characterize this new wave of robotics
- 07:52as almost the fourth industrial
- 07:53revolution. This wave of robotics and
- 07:55AI. We've created machines that [music]
- 07:57allow us to produce many different
- 07:59things and to make the everyday life
- 08:01easier. But this one is really different
- 08:03because this is the first time that
- 08:05we've been able to create machines in
- 08:07intelligence that can really do anything
- 08:09a human can do. And that opens the door
- 08:11for a lot of different things that
- 08:13weren't possible before. If labor gets
- 08:16as [music] cheap as say $2 an hour or it
- 08:20just becomes a product that we can buy.
- 08:21So every single person in the world they
- 08:23can have a personal assistant like
- 08:25everyone has their own iPhone. People
- 08:27can also buy robots or rent robots to
- 08:30maybe even produce things or to build
- 08:32companies that previously maybe they
- 08:34couldn't afford or maybe they couldn't
- 08:36find the right people to do. This is a
- 08:38technological revolution that is
- 08:40different because it turns labor
- 08:42physical labor [music] into a product
- 08:44that almost anybody can access. AI
- 08:46research has really been accelerating.
- 08:48When you think about research, right, AI
- 08:51development, it's not something that is
- 08:52on a on a slope that is completely
- 08:54[music] flat. It's something that
- 08:55changes and it feeds back on itself
- 08:57because the better AI models get. The
- 09:00more of AI research can be automated,
- 09:03the faster it can be done. Loops that
- 09:04were previously required a lot of humans
- 09:06can now be running right 24/7 365. And
- 09:10they're also able to process a lot of
- 09:12information a lot faster. And so a lot
- 09:14of that uh what you consider efficiency
- 09:16gains is also going to be applied to
- 09:19robot AI research. And that can exist
- 09:21across multiple dimensions, right? It
- 09:23helps with the actual speeding up of the
- 09:25research. But there's also a lot of
- 09:27innovation and learnings from AI
- 09:30research that can be applied for
- 09:32physical AI research. Learnings in how
- 09:34to best do data annotation
- 09:36infrastructure around collecting data
- 09:38and annotating data. Learnings and
- 09:40innovations on how to structure
- 09:42mid-training on how to do reinforcement
- 09:44learning. A lot of the same concepts
- 09:46from LLMs can also be applied to [music]
- 09:49physical AI models. And so that's why I
- 09:51think the amount of time for these
- 09:53models to get really good is is probably
- 09:55a lot faster than people think. But at
- 09:57the same time, the models are going to
- 09:59get really good, but that doesn't mean
- 10:00we're going to have robots [music] doing
- 10:01all of that work in the next 2 to 3
- 10:03years. Because even though the
- 10:04intelligence can get there, [music]
- 10:06we're still going to have a bottleneck
- 10:07with manufacturing. I can spin up a
- 10:09million instances of a chatbot
- 10:11instantly, but I can't do that for
- 10:13robots. I can't produce them out of thin
- 10:14air. [music] And so we're going to need
- 10:16to scale up all the factories. We're
- 10:18going to have to scale up the supply
- 10:20chain for all the components that go
- 10:21into a robot and that's going to take
- 10:23some additional time.
The Shift: Why Open Source wins
- 10:29One of my views is that open source
- 10:31models are going to get really good. 2 3
- 10:33years ago, open source models were
- 10:36probably less than a few percentage of
- 10:38all tokens that were produced. Nowadays,
- 10:40open- source models produce something
- 10:42like 25 30% maybe even more of all
- 10:46tokens that are produced. They're
- 10:48getting really good and they're also
- 10:50saturating benchmarks. And so the gap
- 10:52between open source and frontier models,
- 10:54it used to be around 2 years. That was a
- 10:56few years ago. Now it looks something
- 10:58more like 6 months. We're going to get
- 11:00to a point where the open source models
- 11:03start to saturate the benchmarks. Even
- 11:05though there might be a gap between open
- 11:06source and Frontier, that gap may not
- 11:09matter for a lot of tasks in the world.
- 11:11Because if I'm doing a simple task like
- 11:14for example restocking shelves or uh you
- 11:17know assembling a computer mouse I don't
- 11:20need a really high level intelligence to
- 11:21do that. I don't need an Einstein
- 11:23[music]
- 11:24to be able to do these tasks. And so as
- 11:26long as these open source models get to
- 11:28that level which I believe they will the
- 11:31model layer were almost commoditized for
- 11:33physical [music] AI. We're not going to
- 11:34be there yet but I think that's
- 11:36somewhere something that we're going to
- 11:37get to in somewhere maybe the next 3 to
- 11:395 years. And so I think at that point
- 11:42intelligence [music] it becomes really
- 11:44cheap. What I consider you know the most
- 11:46valuable companies or the most important
- 11:48companies are probably going to be the
- 11:49ones that are doing deployments. [music]
- 11:51They're they're producing the hardware
- 11:53uh or you know they're innovating on new
- 11:56designs or components to make these
- 11:57robots even better. Nvidia is also a
- 11:59very big player in open source model
- 12:01development. NVIDIA if you look at them
- 12:03uh they're producing open source models
- 12:04for just general um you know LLM
- 12:07software engineering. Neatron. [music]
- 12:09They're really climbing the benchmarks.
- 12:10They're producing open source models for
- 12:12autonomous vehicles and they're also
- 12:14producing open source models for
- 12:15physical AI and and robot intelligence.
- 12:17And you know, some of the best
- 12:18researchers in the field are yes,
- 12:21they're across some of these closed
- 12:22source labs, but they also are at
- 12:24companies like Nvidia. I think everyone
- 12:26needs to keep in mind that for Nvidia,
- 12:29they're one of the most powerful
- 12:30companies in the AI space. They have a
- 12:32lot of resources. They have a lot of
- 12:34really smart people. It is an almost an
- 12:36existential threat for closed source
- 12:39models to win because as you saw with
- 12:42Anthropic starting to train on Google
- 12:45TPUs, if companies decide to optimize
- 12:48for and train on other hardware, Nvidia
- 12:51starts to lose their business. It
- 12:52becomes a bit of a threat to them. And
- 12:54so that's why they're putting so much
- 12:55effort into developing their own open-
- 12:57source models like Neatron, like the
- 13:00autonomous vehicle models, like you
- 13:02know, all the different physical AI
- 13:04models that they're developing, Brute,
- 13:06Cosmos, Dream Zero, etc. That is
- 13:09something that I I feel like can't be
- 13:11understated because it's if you're
- 13:12building just, you know, physical AI
- 13:14models, you have to think about I'm
- 13:16competing with one of the best AI
- 13:17companies in in the world.
US vs China: Why it's not a race
- 13:24I think some people like to frame this
- 13:26as US versus China. I think both
- 13:28industries are going to be massive in
- 13:30the future and I think they're both
- 13:31independently going to build really
- 13:33great hardware and and robot
- 13:35intelligence industries are going to
- 13:36develop a little bit independently in
- 13:38the sense that the robots that are sold
- 13:41and they're used in America are probably
- 13:43going to come from American companies
- 13:44and the robots that are bought and used
- 13:46in China, they're going to come from
- 13:47Chinese companies. the world is kind of
- 13:49coming to a place where a lot of
- 13:51countries they're interested in
- 13:53independence. They want to produce
- 13:54things in their own country. They don't
- 13:56want to be dependent on another country.
- 13:58They want to make sure that on their own
- 14:00they can survive and they can thrive.
- 14:02And so there's a lot of interest right
- 14:03now in the governments from both China
- 14:06[music] and America to really accelerate
- 14:08the development of robotics in in those
- 14:10individual countries. Some of them uh
- 14:12like China they've invested many
- 14:15billions of dollars either directly or
- 14:17indirectly through government funds in
- 14:19municipalities and [music] in the US
- 14:22that hasn't exactly happened yet but I
- 14:24leave believe we're going to get to
- 14:25there in [music] the future. The US has
- 14:27already shown that they're interested in
- 14:29funding domestic companies. They've
- 14:31funded and provided financing to rare
- 14:34earths processing companies directly
- 14:36invested in semiconductor companies like
- 14:38Intel. And I think it's pretty clear
- 14:40that there's a similar amount of support
- 14:41that's going to come to the domestic
- 14:43robotics industry in America as well. It
- 14:45is true that the US is somewhat ahead on
- 14:48the physical intelligence models. At the
- 14:50same time, there are some really great
- 14:52research groups in in China. Some that
- 14:54are associated with Alibaba, for
- 14:56example, that are building robot models
- 14:58that are pretty close to the frontier.
- 15:00They have really smart researchers
- 15:02there. And there's also really smart
- 15:03researchers in America as well.
- 15:05Eventually, both countries are going to
- 15:07get there. probably independently, but
- 15:09also they're going to collaborate in
- 15:11doing so because there's a lot of open-
- 15:13source research that's published,
- 15:14research that helps both countries.
- 15:17[music] And so, I wouldn't really think
- 15:18about it as as a race or, you know,
- 15:20one's a little bit ahead and one's a
- 15:22little bit behind. I I think it's really
- 15:24kind of short term because I think at
- 15:26the end of the day, in 5 years from now,
- 15:2810 years from now, both countries are
- 15:29going to be able to get there
- 15:31themselves.
Where to build now: The white space of robotics
- 15:37in terms of where people might want to
- 15:39build. I think there's so much white
- 15:40space because there are hardware
- 15:42platforms that exist. It makes the
- 15:44development a lot easier for someone
- 15:46that wants to build for a specific
- 15:47application. And so I think you can
- 15:49really think about robots as kind of
- 15:51like the smartphone, Apple, right? They
- 15:54make the iPhone, but there's this whole
- 15:56developer community that exists outside
- 15:58of people that are just building
- 15:59applications. people that were building
- 16:01applications for time management, for
- 16:05taking notes, etc. That can also happen
- 16:07for robotics where maybe I want to build
- 16:10uh you know robot applications to teach
- 16:13robots or the skills on how to cook
- 16:16really well or maybe how to do elder
- 16:18care or maybe I want to build a robot
- 16:20application to help uh increase uh you
- 16:23know the efficiency of certain [music]
- 16:25farming standards or uh agriculture
- 16:28techniques. I mean you can really think
- 16:29of anything where physical labor is
- 16:31involved as a potential robot
- 16:33application that can be built that that
- 16:35is you know such a large white space.
- 16:38A company that we haven't invested in
- 16:40but we're watching quite closely is is
- 16:42Unatree and also you know other Chinese
- 16:44companies. A lot of these companies,
- 16:46what they do is they haven't they don't
- 16:48take the same approach as the US
- 16:49companies or a lot of the US companies,
- 16:51they wait until they have the product
- 16:52that's perfect that they're ready to
- 16:55basically sell into, you know, the home
- 16:57or factory environment and and it works
- 16:59absolutely perfectly. The approach that
- 17:01the Chinese companies are taking is
- 17:03they're releasing their hardware, their
- 17:06robots as more of a platform for
- 17:08research [music]
- 17:09or entertainment for people to build on.
- 17:11It's not necessarily a case where I can
- 17:13buy a Unistry robot and then it it'll
- 17:16immediately be able to do everything I
- 17:17wanted to do. But it's also a pretty
- 17:20interesting business or commercial
- 17:22strategy because now that the robots are
- 17:25out in the world, you get a little bit
- 17:27of of a of a developer mode. You get a
- 17:29little bit of a deployment mode because
- 17:31people then become comfortable with
- 17:33using those Unity robots, right? There
- 17:35could be developer tools. There could be
- 17:37data collection platforms that are
- 17:39specific to the Unitary robots. If
- 17:41people are doing a lot of robot-based
- 17:43data collection, that might be now
- 17:45unitry specific. And so if you're
- 17:48building models that use a lot of this
- 17:51unitry [music] specific data, those
- 17:53models might run better on Unitry robots
- 17:54as opposed to other robots. And so I
- 17:56think that's a pretty interesting
- 17:58strategy that we're not seeing [music]
- 17:59too many companies in the US take.
- 18:01There's one company in our portfolio
- 18:02called Dexmate that is selling robots
- 18:04and you can consider them using a
- 18:06similar strategy. But that I think is a
- 18:10pretty interesting approach that can
- 18:12result in a lot of other maybe
- 18:15downstream effects because [music] now
- 18:17that everyone has access to these
- 18:19robots, other people can build
- 18:20applications on them. [music] And so
- 18:22those applications don't necessarily
- 18:24need to come from the the company that's
- 18:26building the robots. It can come from
- 18:27outside researchers or other startups
- 18:30that just want to focus on the AI side
- 18:32of things as opposed to building the
- 18:35hardware and figuring out the
- 18:37manufacturing component themselves. I
- 18:39actually think the industry is really
- 18:40early. So I don't think anybody's missed
- 18:42anything yet because you look at the
- 18:44robots today and they're getting a lot
- 18:46better, but they're nowhere near if for
- 18:48example Opus 4.8 8 or chat GPT or any of
- 18:52the LLM models, right, where they're
- 18:54actually doing a lot of the work that
- 18:56humans would do and they're being used
- 18:58across almost every company in in the
- 19:00world today. We're not there for
- 19:02robotics and that's what makes it really
- 19:04exciting time as well because there is
- 19:05still still a lot of opportunity for
- 19:07people to join really exciting companies
- 19:09that have a great growth trajectory or
- 19:12start making investments in the space
- 19:14themselves. I I think the first thing to
- 19:15do is is really just start doing more
- 19:18research, talking to friends that might
- 19:19be working in the industry. If you
- 19:21really want to, right, be involved in
- 19:22some way, either by joining a company,
- 19:25starting your own company, or investing.
- 19:28It's pretty underappreciated how hard
- 19:30building a robotics company actually is.
- 19:33I'm seeing online these days a lot of
- 19:36people from different industries saying,
- 19:37"Hey, look, I'm going to go out and
- 19:39start a robotics company." We're really
- 19:41excited about the industry and we think
- 19:43there's going to be a lot of great
- 19:44companies that come out of this, a lot
- 19:45of great technology that comes out of
- 19:46it. But it is also really hard the
- 19:48amount of kind of uh knowledge that you
- 19:50need to kind of accumulate over over
- 19:52many many years, amount of experience
- 19:53you need to have, right? Like this is
- 19:55not building a software company. To be
- 19:58able to understand uh you know all the
- 20:01components needed to build a successful
- 20:02humanoid company or robotics company
- 20:04from you know mechanical design to
- 20:06electrical engineering, high rate
- 20:08manufacturing, how to actually deploy
- 20:10the robots in the real world. It's a
- 20:12little bit maybe uh underappreciated.
- 20:14There's going to be a lot of maybe
- 20:16investment that goes into the space.
- 20:17There's going to be a lot of startups
- 20:18that go out. But I would maybe caution
- 20:20people to um just appreciate a little
- 20:23bit more how how difficult it is. And
- 20:25you're you're going to need a lot of
- 20:26real experts. People that have years,
- 20:29decades of experience in the space,
- 20:30people that have had a significant
- 20:32amount of experience working at other
- 20:34real, you know, manufacturing or
- 20:36robotics environments before to be able
- 20:38to really build a successful company.