AI Is Killing the Career Ladder. A Stanford Economist Explains What Comes Next | Bharat Chandar
Bharat Chandar, postdoctoral researcher at Stanford's Digital Economy Lab, breaks down why young workers in AI-exposed jobs are seeing 16% slower employment ...
Watch on YouTube →Transcript
Intro
- 00:00We're seeing that the jobs that are more
- 00:01exposed to AI, the young workers in
- 00:03those jobs are seeing 16% slower
- 00:05employment growth. So that's pretty
- 00:07large. The structural change in AI
- 00:10capabilities that are impacting the
- 00:12labor market, that's not going to be a
- 00:13temporary change. If we really unlock
- 00:15AI's capabilities for helping people
- 00:17learn, it could be much easier to switch
- 00:19between different professions. So I'm
- 00:21really hopeful that we end up somewhere
- 00:23closer to a career lattice that works
- 00:25for workers as opposed to a career
- 00:27ladder where there's much more risk
- 00:28about this technological change. I'm
- 00:30Barat Chandra. I'm an economist at the
- 00:32Stanford Digital Economy Lab and I study
- 00:35how AI is impacting work. I would say
- 00:37over the past year and a half or so, I
- 00:39do feel like one of the most important
- 00:41questions in labor economics today is
- 00:43about AI's impact on the labor market.
- 00:45Once I really started using the tools
- 00:47more and understood their capabilities,
- 00:49that became the focus of my research
- 00:51agenda because it felt like one of the
- 00:52most important questions impacting
- 00:54society potentially in the future.
- 01:04I released a study with my collaborators
Canaries in the Coal Mine - What is happening to entry-level workers?
- 01:06Eric Bolson and Ryu Chen. We studied how
- 01:10jobs were changing in jobs that were
- 01:12more exposed to AI versus less exposed
- 01:14to AI. and we were tracking millions of
- 01:15workers across the United States using
- 01:17data from a payroll company called ADP.
- 01:19One of the key findings there is that
- 01:21overall we were not seeing major
- 01:23differences in employment changes for
- 01:25jobs that were more and less exposed to
- 01:27AI. However, when we focus on young
- 01:29workers, we do see more of a divergence
- 01:31there where the jobs that are more
- 01:33exposed to AI, such as software
- 01:34development, customer service, more
- 01:36administrative roles, we were seeing
- 01:38employment declines and jobs that were
- 01:40less exposed to AI, we were still seeing
- 01:42some continued growth and employment.
- 01:44And for more experienced workers as
- 01:46well, we were still seeing employment
- 01:47growth that was pretty much on trend.
- 01:50We're seeing that the jobs that are more
- 01:51exposed to AI, the young workers in
- 01:53those jobs are seeing 16% slower
- 01:55employment growth. a lot of people just
- 01:57starting off in their careers and
- 01:58they're finding it a hard time in doing
- 02:01that. And the reason we chose the
- 02:03canaries and the coal mine title is I
- 02:04think consistent with that view. We want
- 02:06to be tracking these outcomes because we
- 02:08think they could be indicative of
- 02:10potentially future transformative
- 02:12impacts of AI. How much of this is being
- 02:14driven by AI and how is that going to
- 02:16change going forward? We can't be sure
- 02:18whether this is just temporary change in
- 02:21the economy or if it's a structural
- 02:22change being driven by AI. Now, we did
- 02:25test some of the most plausible
- 02:26alternatives that we could think of. So,
- 02:28that includes interest rate changes.
- 02:30Jobs that are more exposed to interest
- 02:32rate changes are actually less exposed
- 02:34to AI. One way to think about that is
- 02:36things like transportation and
- 02:38construction are very exposed to
- 02:39interest rate changes, but they're
- 02:40really not very exposed to AI. So,
- 02:42that's one key thing and that makes me
- 02:44think that it's probably not interest
- 02:45rate changes that are driving our
- 02:46results. Other things that we tested
- 02:48include tech over hiring. So, we can
- 02:50take out the tech sector, we get similar
- 02:51results. Take out computer jobs. We
- 02:53tested some of these different
- 02:54alternatives and we were still getting
- 02:55this very similar results. So, like
- 02:57you're saying, if it's a structural
- 02:58change in AI capabilities that are
- 03:01impacting the labor market, that's not
- 03:02going to be a temporary change. That's
- 03:04potentially going to be a long run
- 03:05change. And the longer that we can track
- 03:07this and if those trends still seem to
- 03:08hold up, that would be indicative of AI
- 03:11potentially impacting work. Now, that
- 03:13said, we don't have an experiment where
- 03:14we can compare a world with AI to one
- 03:16without AI and do a clean comparison.
- 03:19There's definitely a lot more work to be
- 03:21done here to really tease apart the
- 03:23impact of AI.
Young Workers Lost Their Edge. Where’s the new one?
- 03:26If you think about what young workers
- 03:28are doing when they're entering the
- 03:30workforce, a lot of it is
- 03:31implementation, doing things that rely
- 03:34on the book knowledge that they learned
- 03:35while they were at school. Whereas the
- 03:37things that they don't have as much
- 03:38experience with an ability to to do is
- 03:41relying on the tacet knowledge or the
- 03:44sort of experience that you can only get
- 03:45by doing things on the job. also more
- 03:47social interaction and more strategic
- 03:49thinking. Tacid knowledge I think of as
- 03:52things that rely on a lot of hyper local
- 03:55context or strategic thinking or social
- 03:58interaction or things that you only
- 04:00build via experience on the job. So
- 04:02those are the types of things that are
- 04:04maybe not written down as much in a
- 04:06book. For young workers, it's more
- 04:07directly overlapping with the AI
- 04:09capabilities. And those could be the
- 04:11sort of situations where more
- 04:12experienced workers might have a
- 04:14relative advantage compared to AI and
- 04:16also compared to young workers. When it
- 04:18comes to training young workers, it's
- 04:20totally right that firms will want to
- 04:22hire young people if they want to have a
- 04:25middle management or more experienced
- 04:26staff going forward. Now the issue here
- 04:28is even though that they have some
- 04:30incentive to do that so that they have
- 04:32workers in the future, they might not
- 04:34have enough incentive to do that. So
- 04:36they might not hire as much young people
- 04:38as they should from a social perspective
- 04:40and they might not train them as much as
- 04:42they should. And the reason that's the
- 04:43case is because those young people don't
- 04:45have to stay at the company forever.
- 04:47They can just go leave to another
- 04:48company. So it's true that they will
- 04:50still want to hire some of them, but
- 04:52they might not want to hire as many as
- 04:54would be beneficial to society. And it's
- 04:56just kind of this mismatch between what
- 04:58is the incentive of the individual
- 05:00private company versus what is the
- 05:02incentive of society as a whole. Now the
- 05:04more optimistic take that I could give
- 05:06here is that if AI really is as capable
- 05:09of helping people learn uh and as a tool
- 05:11for education maybe could speed up the
- 05:13process at which that happens that could
- 05:15also require a lot of changes in the way
- 05:16that we organize our education system
- 05:19potentially universities or even at a
- 05:20lower level than that to help people
- 05:22learn faster and better. There are three
- 05:24things that I think AI is going to be
- 05:26much less capable of doing certainly in
- 05:28the short to medium term. One physical
- 05:30tasks unless we see a big advance in
- 05:32robotics. Number two is strategic
- 05:35thinking and guiding what needs to be
- 05:37done. And number three is social
- 05:39interaction. I think the strategic
- 05:40thinking is increasingly important and
- 05:43it's going to be even more important
- 05:44going forward potentially because it
- 05:46does seem like in the future a lot of
- 05:48work might look like guiding AI agents
- 05:51to do implementation while you're
- 05:52telling them and guiding them on what
- 05:54needs to be done. And so that sort of
- 05:56strategic thinking, expressing what it
- 05:58is that needs to be done or what I want
- 06:00to be produced, I think that's going to
- 06:02be a pretty key skill and that's kind of
- 06:04the role of what a manager does within a
- 06:06company. So that sort of managerial work
- 06:08and strategic guidance could potentially
- 06:10be a quite important skill going
- 06:12forward. When I think about young
- 06:14workers, how can they develop those
- 06:16sorts of skills? building and using the
- 06:17tools as much as possible and getting
- 06:20used to to that sort of mode of work.
- 06:22The faster that that can happen, the
- 06:24better that they might be uh in terms of
- 06:26adjusting to labor market disruptions or
- 06:29these technological changes.
- 06:33I do think it's very helpful to compare
From Career Ladder to Career Lattice
- 06:35AI to some of these historical changes.
- 06:37So for example, the industrial
- 06:39revolution. I think one comparison
- 06:41between AI and that period that was a
- 06:43case where it was actually the most
- 06:45skilled workers who faced more risk from
- 06:47the industrial revolution. So one case
- 06:49that comes to mind is the lites who were
- 06:51these kind of skilled textile workers
- 06:54and the new inventions that came about
- 06:56during the industrial revolution
- 06:57actually led a lot of them to lose their
- 06:59work and those were kind of the more
- 07:00skilled workers in society. Something
- 07:02that you might be seeing that's kind of
- 07:03similar here is that it's more of the
- 07:05knowledge workers in more educated roles
- 07:07that might be facing greater AI
- 07:09exposure. So I think that's an
- 07:10interesting comparison. If we think
- 07:12about things like electricity or the IT
- 07:15revolution, so basically over the course
- 07:17of the 20th century, a lot of those were
- 07:19actually kind of the opposite where it
- 07:21was kind of this middle skill or
- 07:23low-skilled work that tended to be more
- 07:25exposed to that technology. Whereas the
- 07:28most skilled, the highest educated
- 07:30people benefited a lot more from the
- 07:32development of this new technology. So
- 07:33we still have to see going forward, is
- 07:35AI going to look more like the first
- 07:37case or the second case? I do think
- 07:39there's something worth bearing in mind
- 07:40here. So one way that AI might be
- 07:42different than past historical episodes
- 07:44is just the rate of capabilities
- 07:46improvement. Even today it's much more
- 07:48capable of doing different tasks than it
- 07:49was 3 years ago and I do think there's
- 07:51this question about as new work gets
- 07:53created there's new demand for existing
- 07:56work etc. Are those going to be done by
- 07:59humans or are the AI capabilities going
- 08:01to advance fast enough that AI is also
- 08:03going to be doing that kind of work? And
- 08:04I think that's the one area where we
- 08:06could think that potentially AI could be
- 08:07different than prior technologies.
- 08:09There's been a lot of discussion about
- 08:11how we can use AI to augment workers and
- 08:14make them better off as opposed to
- 08:15potentially just substituting them from
- 08:17the workforce and automating all
- 08:19everything that they're doing. Where I
- 08:21was going with this essay is just trying
- 08:22to suggest one concrete solution that I
- 08:26think could potentially augment workers
- 08:28quite a bit. It using AI as a tool for
- 08:31helping people learn. I think an example
- 08:33of a person who's augmenting themselves
- 08:35with AI right now. An example of that
- 08:38would be a startup founder with a really
- 08:40lean team that's able to do a lot more
- 08:42tasks because they have access to the
- 08:44AI. All of the different functions that
- 08:46previously they wouldn't have had any
- 08:47idea how to do. Now they can do it
- 08:50themselves because they have access to
- 08:51these AI tools. I I think that's a very
- 08:53good example in fact of augmentation.
- 08:55Whether you're more automated or
- 08:56augmented really depends on what are the
- 08:58tasks that you're focusing on. Are you
- 09:00increasing the scope of tasks that you
- 09:02can do or are your tasks getting shrunk
- 09:04by the introduction of this technology?
- 09:06The reason that I think that this could
- 09:08be wonderful in terms of augmentation is
- 09:10that when we think about technology that
- 09:12benefits workers, often it is increasing
- 09:15the set of tasks that they're able to
- 09:17do. In contrast, things that automate
- 09:19work that substitute for workers, those
- 09:21are things that take away some of the
- 09:23tasks that workers have to do and now
- 09:25they have to do fewer things. know I
- 09:26think the goal is to try to find ways to
- 09:28augment workers to make them more
- 09:31capable of doing things. And one of the
- 09:33best ways that we know historically for
- 09:35doing that is by educating them. With
- 09:37education, workers are able to do a lot
- 09:39more than they could do before. I do
- 09:41think there's something worth bearing in
- 09:43mind here. So one way that AI might be
- 09:45different than past historical episodes
- 09:47is just the rate of capabilities
- 09:49improvement. And I think we have an
- 09:51opportunity right now for one of the
- 09:54biggest changes in learning capabilities
- 09:57that we've had in 100 years if not
- 09:59longer. And that's in using the AI tools
- 10:01for personalized learning. For me, using
- 10:04AI for augmentation, there's a couple
- 10:07branches to that. And something that
- 10:08increasingly I'm using it for is
- 10:09actually for math. There are areas where
- 10:12I might need to write down a model or
- 10:14prove something. And it's really, really
- 10:16good at that. The way that that's
- 10:18augmenting is that it's easier to check
- 10:19if something is correct than it is to
- 10:22necessarily write it from scratch. And
- 10:24so I also potentially view that as a as
- 10:27a significant way of augmenting my work.
- 10:29Now, on the other hand, things that I
- 10:30don't do with AI, I personally don't
- 10:33really use it for writing. And the
- 10:34reason I don't use it for writing is
- 10:35that writing helps me think and it helps
- 10:38me understand a problem really well when
- 10:40I do it myself. It's not that I don't
- 10:42trust the AI tools to do the writing.
- 10:45It's more that I would get way less
- 10:47value out of the writing if I didn't do
- 10:48it myself and understood what it was
- 10:50that I was talking about. I think in
- 10:51deciding what we want to delegate and
- 10:53what we want to preserve as human, I
- 10:56think a lot of that depends on what it
- 10:58is that humans want and some of that is
- 11:00about values like what is right, what is
- 11:02wrong. Some of that is also just
- 11:04expressing our preferences. So what do
- 11:07we want to build? What would make us
- 11:08better off? What would make us happier?
- 11:10What are the things that we would
- 11:11actually want to use AI for for
- 11:13implementation? That's something that we
- 11:15have to express to the AI. I think those
- 11:17sorts of tasks, it's not obvious to me
- 11:19how that's going to be automated, you
- 11:21know, in the short to medium term at
- 11:22least because some of that both it
- 11:25depends on also our reflection. We need
- 11:27to think through what it is that we
- 11:29want. Sometimes we learn about what it
- 11:30is that we want as we reflect on it and
- 11:33as we think more about it. And so that
- 11:35guidance about what it is that we should
- 11:37build, what it is that we should
- 11:38implement, that I view as at least in
- 11:40the short to medium term being more
- 11:42characteristically human than AI. And I
- 11:44view the AI is more on the
- 11:45implementation side.
- 11:48Imagine that AI really reduces the
- 11:51benefits of learning something new. An
- 11:53interesting thing about this is that
- 11:54that's a world where potentially
- 11:55inequality is much lower in the labor
- 11:57market. If the barriers to getting at
- 11:59the top of a field or getting the
- 12:02highest quality output in a given
- 12:04occupation or something, if that barrier
- 12:07becomes much lower because AI can do a
- 12:09lot of the hardest tasks, then that's
- 12:11actually a world where potentially
- 12:12inequality is lower because the
- 12:14difference between people who know a lot
- 12:16in school and are very capable could be
- 12:19not that different from people who don't
- 12:21try that hard in school. It's kind of
- 12:22interesting because there's this
- 12:24potentially trade-off between inequality
- 12:26and investments in learning. On the
- 12:28other hand, if AI really increases the
- 12:31benefits of this sort of strategic
- 12:32thinking, even these social skills,
- 12:34etc., that could actually increase the
- 12:36benefits of trying really hard in school
- 12:38because if I can develop the strategic
- 12:40thinking skills, then I'll be really
- 12:42valuable in the labor market.
- 12:44I would encourage young people, students
- 12:46to use the AI tools as much as they can
- 12:50uh build with them and really focus on
- 12:52developing that kind of strategic
- 12:53thinking. How do you best make use of
- 12:55these tools? Where are the areas where
- 12:57they're not as good and what are areas
- 12:59in which you as a human can add a lot of
- 13:01value? I think there are some very
- 13:03complicated ways of thinking about how
- 13:05AI might affect thinking going forward.
- 13:07There are some newer interventions that
- 13:10are happening here uh education style
- 13:12modes with AI usage to make people focus
- 13:16on the critical thinking skills as
- 13:18opposed to just offloading the task. So
- 13:20there are different sort of platforms. I
- 13:22know uh Khan Academy for example has one
- 13:24where you can use the AI tool but it's
- 13:26not going to give you the answer. It's
- 13:28going to help you think through how to
- 13:31get to the answer as opposed to just
- 13:32giving it to you off the bat. I do think
- 13:34that we could imagine a world in the
- 13:36future where if we really unlock AI's
- 13:39capabilities for helping people learn,
- 13:41it could be much easier to switch
- 13:42between different professions based on
- 13:45how demand for those jobs is evolving
- 13:47over time. And if some uh job becomes
- 13:50much more important in the economy, if
- 13:52we can find a way to help people
- 13:54transition faster, that could really
- 13:56unlock a lot of potential. So I'm really
- 13:58hopeful that we end up somewhere closer
- 14:00to a career lattice that works for
- 14:02workers as opposed to a career ladder
- 14:04where there's much more risk about this
- 14:06technological change.
- 14:08For the first time I struggled to
Next Episode
- 14:11assemble questions that chat GPT would
- 14:13get wrong. I was devastated was thinking
- 14:16how am I going to stay ahead of AI? I
- 14:20actually think that's the wrong
- 14:21question. My name is Ken Ono. I'm a
- 14:23mathematician and I also work in the
- 14:25space called AI for math. I'm a
- 14:27professor at the University of Virginia
- 14:28on leave and I'm the founding
- 14:30mathematician at Axiom Math. My view on
- 14:32intelligence now has changed quite a
- 14:35bit. We in this world aren't doing the
- 14:39best we can at educating our children.
- 14:43And I don't say that to be critical of
- 14:45educators. I am an educator. It's always
- 14:47a treat to visit a kindergarten class, a
- 14:51first grade class when it's bring your
- 14:53parent to school day so they can talk
- 14:55about what they do. Oh, I know all the
- 14:57prime numbers or I'm really good at
- 14:59adding that wonder and I want to just
- 15:01bottle up this energy because if we
- 15:04could maintain that wonder in the world
- 15:07and the energy that children have when
- 15:11everything around them is new. Think
- 15:13about where we would be today. The
- 15:15ability and the potential to be someone
- 15:17like Romanagen or at least creative in a
- 15:20productive way. I think it resides in us
- 15:23all. Who owns your identity? You do.