How Great Tech Leaders Think and Decide | Ex-Meta CTO & Gigascale Founder, Mike Schroepfer
Meet Mike Schroepfer, former CTO of Meta and partner at Gigascale Capital. He joined Facebook in 2008 and spent 17 years at the company, leading its engineering organization for over a decade and later serving as a Senior Fellow.
Watch on YouTube →Transcript
Intro
- 00:00Hi, I'm Mike Sheper. Um, I spent 25
- 00:02years building, starting and scaling
- 00:03technology companies. Worked at a small
- 00:05startup. Worked at two small startups
- 00:07actually in the dotcom boom. Then
- 00:08started my own company after the dot
- 00:10crash. Sold that off to a bigger company
- 00:12on micros systemystems. Then joined
- 00:14Mozilla which made the Firefox web
- 00:15browser helped ship 152030 back when
- 00:19version numbers were small. They weren't
- 00:20in the '7s. And then in 2008 I joined a
- 00:22little social network called Facebook
- 00:24which was you know smaller than MySpace
- 00:26at the time. And then over the next
- 00:2814-15 years led engineering, built data
- 00:30centers, uh took us into the consumer
- 00:32hardware business with virtual reality
- 00:34headsets, managed multiple
- 00:35billion-dollar acquisitions, built an AI
- 00:37research lab, sort of build hardware,
- 00:38software, enterprise, and consumer, and
- 00:40scaled the team from, you know, 100 to
- 00:4235,000ish. I'm now helping great
- 00:45entrepreneurs through starting a venture
- 00:47capital firm called Gigascale Capital
- 00:49where we are hunting for founders with
- 00:51big ideas using technological advances
- 00:54to build products that makes people's
- 00:56lives better. and it solves a climate
- 00:58environmental problem and it turns out
- 00:59to actually be a great business along
- 01:00the way. Easy example of this that is
- 01:02you know electric vehicles spew no
- 01:04pollution. They're cheaper to operate.
- 01:06They're cheaper to maintain. They're
- 01:07faster. They're quieter. They have been
- 01:09traditionally more expensive. But as
- 01:11batteries get cheaper and cheaper,
- 01:12they're getting more and more cost
- 01:14competitive. And so we're looking for
- 01:16products that are cost competitive and
- 01:18people love and then also are better for
- 01:20human health and for the planet. That's
- 01:22a version of what we do.
Scaling Facebook: Building the Backbone Under Pressure
- 01:35It was August or September of 2008. We
- 01:38had a product that people loved, the
- 01:40website facebook.com. More people were
- 01:42signing up every day. Those are new
- 01:43features being added to the site all the
- 01:45time. At the time, the most urgent
- 01:47problem was scale. Literally the problem
- 01:50was you know every week or every month
- 01:51on keeping the site running and the
- 01:54software backbone and hardware backbone
- 01:56for building this sort of product didn't
- 01:58really exist. So a lot of the first many
- 02:00years I spent there was scaling and
- 02:03rebuilding the software architecture of
- 02:05the site and then building the hardware
- 02:07infrastructure to do this. You know when
- 02:08I first got there we were releasing
- 02:10space in those data centers and putting
- 02:11servers in them and and building it up.
- 02:13But because of the financial crisis of
- 02:15the real estate crisis in 2008, people
- 02:17had stopped building large data centers
- 02:19and so we couldn't get more space. So we
- 02:21had to build our own and there was a lot
- 02:23of challenges and you know we had to
- 02:24learn a lot. None of these things were
- 02:25perfect the first time. We made some
- 02:26mistakes and we had to fix them and we
- 02:28had enough humility to know that we had
- 02:31to learn a bunch of new things and so
- 02:33you know the first goal was hiring
- 02:34people who had done data center work who
- 02:36had done network design people with the
- 02:37actual background in this space. So the
- 02:39goal was go hire a team to understand
- 02:41this new area and then help us get good.
- 02:44Like many problems in a company, you
- 02:45know, if you're a founder or prospective
- 02:47founder watching this, most of the
- 02:49things a startup does, it does out of
- 02:51just complete necessity. It's like,
- 02:53well, we can't get space. We don't
- 02:54really have a choice here. We have to
- 02:56figure this out. One of the lessons that
You Can’t Avoid the Hard Problems
- 02:58I took away was there's no getting away
- 03:01from the hard problems. You just got to
- 03:03get to it. So it's like okay if we need
- 03:04to solve this problem let's like figure
- 03:06out what are the critical risks what are
- 03:07the things we understand the least or
- 03:09the highest technical risks and let's
- 03:10work on those first. I think there's
- 03:12this like human instinct to solve
- 03:14tractable problems. So it's kind of like
- 03:16I've got this task I want to do but my
- 03:18room's kind of messy. I'm going to go
- 03:19clean my whole office. I don't want to
- 03:20go work on the hard thing. And like
- 03:21that's a very human sort of trait. So
- 03:24it's like important to work against it.
- 03:25Say like actually no it doesn't matter.
- 03:27My office is messy. like if I don't get
- 03:29this pitch done right and get raise
- 03:30money for this company, then nothing
- 03:32else matters. Doesn't matter if my
- 03:33office is clean or not. So, I think that
- 03:35trying to get people focused on the
- 03:36right hard problems and running at them
- 03:38is is really critical.
Why Meta Went All-In on AI
- 03:43Early years of Facebook, it was sort of
- 03:45just pants on fire all the time. Wasn't
- 03:47totally solved, but it wasn't so much
- 03:49consuming all of our energy that we had
- 03:50a little bit of energy to look forward.
- 03:532013, Facebook started the AI research.
- 03:56One of the questions was, you know,
- 03:57should you establish a more
- 03:59broad-reaching research lab? There were
- 04:01things like Microsoft research or IBM
- 04:04research or others who were kind of like
- 04:05could do software theory, could do lots
- 04:07of different areas of technology. The
- 04:09most preient part of all of this was to
- 04:11say AI is such a big thing and so
- 04:14impactful that you wouldn't want to
- 04:16spend time on these other things. You'd
- 04:17want to take all the energy you had and
- 04:19focus it on AI. This is a debate Mark
- 04:21and I had and I you know I think he was
- 04:23the one actually who kind of pushed to
- 04:24say like let's make sure we just do AI.
- 04:26Part of it was having visibility to what
- 04:28was going on in the ecosystem. There was
- 04:30you know this the imageet challenge was
- 04:32this famous academic challenge of object
- 04:34identification that no one was paying
- 04:36that much attention to except when the
- 04:38first neural net entered the challenge
- 04:40and sort of was so much better than
- 04:42everything else. It is one of these rare
- 04:44moments, you know, there are these
- 04:46moments in tech where something shows up
- 04:47and it's like, "Oh my gosh, that thing
- 04:49is like 10% better than anything, a very
- 04:52large amount compared to any other gap,
- 04:54and it used neural net's training on
- 04:56data." So, it's a different approach.
- 04:58You then look at that thing and say
- 04:59like, okay, is that at the end of its
- 05:02runway in terms of capability or is it
- 05:04at the beginning? And you say, well,
- 05:05what's powering it? you say what's
- 05:07powering it is like the size of the
- 05:08neural net, the size of the data set,
- 05:11and the amount of computation you can
- 05:12give it both in training and in
- 05:14inference. And even at the time it was
- 05:16like wow, we we can scale all of those
- 05:18things by thousands of times easily. And
- 05:21so even if we invent nothing new, you
- 05:24could get a lot more out of this. And so
- 05:26this is what I'd like to say is like
- 05:27it's a technology with a lot of runway.
- 05:29It's not fully optimized. But but the
- 05:31point being is as a technology, it was
- 05:33at its infancy in terms of its ability
- 05:34to grow and scale. And those are the
- 05:36things that I think are really exciting.
- 05:38And I think when we've, you know, when
- 05:39Meta's invested in them and when I've
- 05:40invested in them, that's where you have
- 05:42a lot of opportunity versus things that
- 05:44have been optimized for 150 years. And
- 05:46there's just not a lot of room for for
- 05:48improvement.
Take the Leap: Believe Before It Works
- 05:50Everything always feels obvious and
- 05:53afterthought. And I had definitely seen
- 05:55people who at the time something was
- 05:57coming out questioned and doubted it.
- 05:59And then 3 years later, it was obvious,
- 06:01oh, I knew all along this was going to
- 06:02be great. And I was like, no, no, you
- 06:04didn't. Um, and and I think it's fine.
- 06:06It's like human nature to doubt
- 06:07something until you can touch and feel
- 06:08it. And you had to take that leap. And
- 06:10not everyone, you know, beginnings of a
- 06:12new technology takes that leap and they
- 06:14say, "Well, I I just don't believe it's
- 06:15going to scale or work." And sometimes
- 06:16they're right. Like sometimes things
- 06:18don't work and they don't scale, you
- 06:19know, and then every time you get
- 06:21something to a useful point, there's
- 06:23always some other useful point it hasn't
- 06:24done yet. So we you know the very first
- 06:26part of AI that started working
- 06:27commercially really well was this sort
- 06:29of ability to analyze images and to say
- 06:31like okay we can start labeling things
- 06:33in these images and understand them um
- 06:35translation started to work reasonably
- 06:37well so you could do text you know from
- 06:39one language to another but this idea of
- 06:41a sort of chatbot that I could talk to
- 06:44that had any semblance of intelligence
- 06:47it was better than anything we had
- 06:49before but still not very good at the
- 06:52time the demos were terrible you know
- 06:53you could barely say how many people
- 06:55were in this photo? Is there is there a
- 06:56cat in this photo? And if you think of
- 06:58this from a like what can I do with it
- 07:00standpoint, it wasn't obvious like this
- 07:03it wasn't good enough to do anything
- 07:04with. And so you'd have to look at that
- 07:06and say like oh no no that'll get better
- 07:09which is hard for a lot of people to
- 07:12believe. And then it's not until you can
- 07:13touch and feel and it's really the kind
- 07:15of the chat GPT moment where most
- 07:16consumers actually had their first
- 07:18experience with an AI chatbot and you're
- 07:20like oh wait it actually can do some
- 07:21useful things for me now I believe. You
- 07:23know, you have a similar experience with
- 07:25self-driving cars. Most people like
- 07:27conceptually get scared of them and
- 07:28like, "Oh, it' make me super nervous."
- 07:30I've taken a lot of people on Whimo
- 07:31rides in San Francisco. It's one of my
- 07:33favorite things to do. You get in the
- 07:34back of the car, like 5 minutes in,
- 07:36you're bored. You're like, "Oh, it's
- 07:38like a better driver than than most
- 07:40distracted, tired humans." Um, and
- 07:42you're like now on your phone and you're
- 07:43like, "This is boring." And so this is
- 07:45the challenge of new technology is I
- 07:47have yet to encounter a new technology
- 07:49that until I could show it to you in a
- 07:51way that was obviously useful that you
- 07:53could personally experience. It is so
- 07:55easy to doubt it. Once you get to that
- 07:56point, you've like captured all the
- 07:58value. So a lot of the challenge is like
- 08:00how do you identify technologies that
- 08:02have an opportunity to get to that point
- 08:04but aren't there yet? Um because that's
- 08:06where the sort of place to have impact
Three Core Questions for Spotting Breakout Technologies Early
- 08:08is. So if I'm looking at a new
- 08:10technology trying to decide whether this
- 08:11is something that might be a breakout,
- 08:14you know, transformative technology, I
- 08:15think there's three core things I'm
- 08:17looking for. The first and most
- 08:18important question is sort of
- 08:20understanding the light speed test. As
- 08:22far as we know in experimental physics,
- 08:24you can't go faster than the speed of
- 08:25light. If I was building spacecraft, you
- 08:27know, and I was at 99.9% the speed of
- 08:30light, there's not a lot of room for me
- 08:32to get faster, right? And you say, I'm
- 08:33going to make it twice as fast. Like
- 08:34that's really, really, really, really
- 08:36hard. You know, if I'm at 0.001 Oh, one
- 08:38the speed of light. I got a lot of room
- 08:40to go before I've hit any theoretical
- 08:41limit. And so for most technologies, my
- 08:44first question is how far away from
- 08:47theoretical maximum is the current
- 08:49version of the thing? Like how much
- 08:50headroom do you have to scale an
- 08:52improvement? Is it thousands of times?
- 08:54Is it 1%. Um that's question number one.
- 08:57Then question number two is are there
- 09:00tailwinds? Are there things that are
- 09:02happening that make this technology
- 09:04better that you are not working on? And
- 09:06usually this means that there's some
- 09:08input into the component that improves
- 09:10year-over-year without your work. In the
- 09:12AI world, for example, the idea of
- 09:14getting more compute power was happening
- 09:16without our effort because Nvidia, TSMC,
- 09:20ASML, the entire chip ecosystem was
- 09:22developing faster, more powerful chips
- 09:25year-over-year. So for the same dollar I
- 09:27could get every 18 months about double
- 09:28the compute power. So I didn't need to
- 09:30do any work. I didn't need to go build a
- 09:31chip team and go do design chips. It's
- 09:33just like every year I got more
- 09:34computation without me doing a single
- 09:36amount of work. So that's question
- 09:37number two is do I have some tailwind
- 09:39making my product better even when I'm
- 09:41asleep. And then number three which is
- 09:43the hardest is what problem are you
- 09:46solving and how important is it to your
- 09:48customer? Your customer could be a
- 09:49consumer could be a company but there
- 09:51are plenty of amazing technologies that
- 09:53have made great advances that don't
- 09:55actually solve a problem for people. The
- 09:57biggest example of this is 3D TVs. For a
- 09:59long time, everyone's like, "Tre is it's
- 10:01the next step forward from 2D. It's more
- 10:03immersive." It turns out people don't
- 10:05want to put like special glasses on, you
- 10:07know, and sit in their couch and do it.
- 10:09So 3D TVs were a technological leap that
- 10:12didn't solve a problem for consumers
- 10:14that they cared about. So it's been
- 10:15mostly a failure. What we do with
- 10:17advanced technologies is you try to mock
- 10:19them up and say like, "Okay, I haven't
- 10:21built the thing yet. what's the best
- 10:22sort of proxy of the thing that I can
- 10:24use to show people to get a sense of if
- 10:27I built this thing would you like it
- 10:29that is that customer exploration is is
- 10:31really important because ultimately
- 10:34someone has to buy that technology some
- 10:37business model have to pay for it
- 10:38someone has to buy it to fund all the
- 10:40R&D and if there isn't some loop of
- 10:42money there somewhere it'll eventually
Why I Left Big Tech to Break the Bottleneck to Progress
- 10:53To me, the problem was obvious. I mean,
- 10:55it's something that I've been passionate
- 10:57about for a long time. I had the very
- 10:59first Nissan Leaf, which is the first
- 11:00electric vehicle I could buy. Early
- 11:02generation products. It was terrible.
- 11:03Had very bad range. Really, the question
- 11:05was, is there really anything I can do
- 11:07about it? It just it feels like a big
- 11:09overwhelming problem. And it takes
- 11:11either some hubris or some naive to
- 11:14believe that I can actually have a
- 11:16meaningful impact on it. And I think
- 11:18what I decided at some point was it
- 11:20didn't really matter whether I could. I
- 11:22had to try. And when I think about the
- 11:23problems humanity needs to go tackle,
- 11:26massive amounts of additional clean
- 11:27energy is upstream of everything we want
- 11:29to do. You know, if you sort of take a
- 11:31longer view of the industrial
- 11:32revolution, really what humanity has
- 11:34done is we've harnessed energy, whether
- 11:36it's animals, whether it's fuels or
- 11:37sometimes renewables do work for us. So
- 11:40instead of manually farming or manually
- 11:43digging, you know, we have machines that
- 11:44do it for us. And that has had a huge
- 11:46uplift in productivity and in human
- 11:49health and happiness. You know, the only
- 11:51way we're going to get AI progress is by
- 11:53massively increasing energy use. The
- 11:55only way we're going to get people in
- 11:57comfort and air conditioning with clean
- 11:58water. It's it's energy. That is the
- 12:01upstream problem to everything you look
- 12:02at. We know how to desalinate water and
- 12:04make clean water. We know how to keep
- 12:05people cool on a hot day. We know how to
- 12:07manufacture lots of different things. We
- 12:09know how to make super intelligent
- 12:10assistance. We don't know how to scale
- 12:12that to 8 billion people without
- 12:14terowatts of additional clean energy and
- 12:16there are lots of ways to go solve that
- 12:18problem and lots of entrepreneurs off
- 12:20tackling solutions that can that can
- 12:22have an impact in the world at that
- 12:23scale. And it took me a little bit of
Startups Will Solve Sustainability
- 12:26time to figure out exactly the mechanism
- 12:28to do so. And and what I figured out was
- 12:30solving sustainability is is
- 12:32re-engineering tens of trillions of
- 12:34dollars in our economy. You know, energy
- 12:35alone is a multi-t trillion dollar
- 12:37business. And if you want to do that,
- 12:39you can't do it with government money.
- 12:40You can't do it with philanthropy. You
- 12:42need businesses to be investing. And the
- 12:45place to do that is usually through
- 12:47startups. Is you've got this cohort of
- 12:49really amazing entrepreneurs out there
- 12:51chasing ideas from fusion to next
- 12:53generation micro reactors to offshore AI
- 12:56data centers, dehydrators for your
- 12:58kitchen. And that my personal experience
- 13:01in building companies over 25 years was
- 13:04just uniquely valuable. As I spent time
- 13:06with entrepreneurs, I realized there was
- 13:08a lot I could do to help them skip over
- 13:10the common mistakes you make when
- 13:11building a team. How do I hire
- 13:12executives? How do I manage sort of
- 13:14product development? All of these sorts
- 13:15of things. And so, it's just a great
- 13:17coalignment with my skills and sort of
- 13:19the change I want to see in the world.
- 13:21And it's just awesome to see these
- 13:22products take off in the market. And so
- 13:24there's a lot of exciting work happening
Better, Faster, Cheaper: Products People Actually Love
- 13:26in clean power that is effectively
- 13:28unlimited, meaning we can 10x, 5x, you
- 13:31know, multiple orders of magnitude above
- 13:33what we're using today worldwide in
- 13:34power and power the whole planet. The
- 13:36most exciting and most ambitious of this
- 13:38is fusion. The idea of basically the the
- 13:41power source of our sun. We know it
- 13:43works in the universe. We've actually
- 13:44made it happen on planet Earth before.
- 13:46We know how to make fusion work. We just
- 13:47haven't yet figured out how to turn it
- 13:49into a reliable power source. If I can
- 13:51make it work, I can build a power plant
- 13:53that requires almost no inputs and
- 13:55produces no emissions. It's completely
- 13:58safe and we can build kind of unlimited
- 14:00these power plant that could power all
- 14:02of Austin, Texas, would require one
- 14:04pickup truck a year of fuel, which is
- 14:06absolutely insane. That would take train
- 14:08loads of of coal cars or amazing amounts
- 14:10of gas to do the equivalent sort of
- 14:12generation. So, from an efficiency
- 14:13standpoint, it's sort of the endgame for
- 14:15power generation. So this is energy and
- 14:16I could talk a lot more about those but
- 14:18let's talk about you know just one other
- 14:20example of something that people
- 14:21watching this might experience at home
- 14:24which is um you know the idea of
- 14:25throwing away food in the garbage. When
- 14:27you throw food in the garbage it goes to
- 14:29a landfill. It rots, releases methane.
- 14:31This is a major source of near-term
- 14:33warming and waste. There's a company
- 14:34called Mill. It's a little trash can. It
- 14:36looks like a little pop-up trash can. Um
- 14:38but it's magic. You throw food into it.
- 14:41It dries it up, grinds it up, turns it
- 14:43into what looks like little coffee
- 14:44grounds. You can do this in an average
- 14:46family home for probably a month and at
- 14:48the end of that month you have a shoe
- 14:49box size of these grounds. Most
- 14:51importantly, it doesn't smell. You don't
- 14:53have to empty it for a month. And so the
- 14:54the pitch to consumers is empty your
- 14:57trash less and it stinks less, you know,
- 14:59and I kind of laugh. Nobody really
- 15:01enjoys emptying their trash. And so I
- 15:02would say you can do it less and it's
- 15:04smaller and it stinks less then
- 15:05everyone's excited. And it turns out
- 15:07this is a major diverter of food waste
- 15:10related emissions. And the thing about
- 15:12this product is if you meet someone who
- 15:13has it, you'll know it because they love
- 15:15it. It's a product that people buy
- 15:17because they love and it saves a food
- 15:19waste problem, saves a consumer problem.
- 15:21And guess what? This company is making
- 15:23great revenue and and money on us. This
- 15:25is an example of a better, faster,
- 15:27cheaper. It makes people's lives better,
- 15:29and it solves a climate environmental
- 15:30problem. And it turns out to actually be
- 15:32a great business along the way.
Technology Matters — People Matter More
- 15:39People have operated big things. people
- 15:41started companies very few people have
- 15:42seen the sort of the scale you know I
- 15:45built tens of millions of square foots
- 15:47of data center space we've shipped tens
- 15:48of millions of consumer hardware
- 15:50products you know scale teams to tens of
- 15:52thousands managed lots of multi-billion
- 15:54dollar acquisitions so you know I've had
- 15:56the great fortune of working with an
- 15:58absolutely incredible cohort of people
- 15:59on an amazing set of technologies in
- 16:02hardware in software in deep research
- 16:04and and others all everything we've
- 16:05talked about here is is what we bring to
- 16:07bear was how do you find the right
- 16:08problem identification the technology
- 16:10that has headroom to scale and tailwinds
- 16:12and customer demand. And then what we
- 16:14haven't talked about is is people. You
- 16:15know, a lot of my job ended up being
- 16:18finding out who were the right leaders,
- 16:20technical, organizational, otherwise to
- 16:22take something forward. And in the
- 16:23startup realm, the team is ultimately
- 16:25what you're betting on. You know, these
- 16:27are the people who are going to build
- 16:28that company. And we're looking for
- 16:30founders who could take the company as
- 16:32far as possible. Meaning the challenge
- 16:34of a company is a company at 10
- 16:35employees at preede or seed is a very
- 16:38different company than a 300 person
- 16:40company with customers in the series C
- 16:42and that rate of change is unusual for
- 16:45humans like you don't usually encounter
- 16:47environments that change that much and
- 16:48so there is a rare set of people who can
- 16:51scale through those changes and I've had
- 16:53the great fortune of working with many
- 16:54of them I've had the ability to do it
- 16:56myself and so a lot of what I'm looking
- 16:58for is that people identification of
- 16:59like as we meet thousand founders a year
- 17:02these are the 10 for this year that we
- 17:04think have the best shot at scaling this
- 17:06company into a public company and that
- 17:08is a lot of the sort of that pattern
- 17:10matching on people's ability to scale is
- 17:13a lot of what we're doing. So coupled
- 17:14with technology and market, you know,
- 17:16it's it's really people.
What Winning Founders Have in Common
- 17:18I think what we see in founders, you
- 17:21know, there's questions about how do you
- 17:22evaluate it? What we look for in
- 17:23founders is number one, you need a
- 17:26complete relentlessness, a
- 17:28determination. Building a company is a
- 17:30never-ending series of near-death
- 17:32disasters and a lot of people telling
- 17:34you what you're doing isn't going to
- 17:35work and a lot of people saying no. New
- 17:37recruits say no, investors say no,
- 17:39customers say no. And you need to get 30
- 17:41nos in a row. It doesn't really matter
- 17:43if 30 investors say no if one says yes.
- 17:45I mean, I remember from 25 years ago
- 17:47going out on Sand Hill Road trying to
- 17:49convince people to invest in my startup
- 17:50as a first-time founder. And I got a ton
- 17:52of nos. You know, I had someone fall
- 17:54asleep in one of our pitch meetings. But
- 17:55then we got the world's best venture
- 17:57capital firm, Sequoia Capital, to say
- 17:59yes. And that was the defining moment,
- 18:01you know, and that that helped us build
- 18:02a really successful company. And so, as
- 18:04a founder, you need to have this
- 18:05determination to just like keep going
- 18:07despite setbacks. That's number one.
- 18:09Number two is building a company as a
- 18:11CEO is a different job every single day.
- 18:14You might have to solve technical
- 18:16problems. You might then have to go talk
- 18:17to customers. You might have to go
- 18:18recruit people. You might have to get a
- 18:20lab space. You're going to be doing a
- 18:22different job every single day. And
- 18:24there's a category of people I call them
- 18:26like just consumers of new information.
- 18:28And they have this combination of
- 18:30humility that they don't know something
- 18:32and curiosity figure out how to learn
- 18:34it. And that combination allows them to
- 18:37do everything like how do I run a board
- 18:39me? How do I pitch an investor? Like
- 18:41these are all things our founders
- 18:42learned how to do successfully. And so
- 18:44you're looking for people who
- 18:46demonstrate this ability to decide they
- 18:48don't know something and then figure out
- 18:49how to learn it as quickly as possible
- 18:52um andor hire people who know how to do
- 18:54it, you know, for their company. So it's
- 18:55it's really those two things. this like
- 18:57unrelenting determination and this like
- 19:00ability to understand, identify and
- 19:02learn new domains on a very rapid clip.
There’s No Perfect Founder Checklist
- 19:05Well, the challenge is, you know,
- 19:06everyone tries to distill it down into
- 19:08a, you know, if I could just like check
- 19:10off a couple of things in their
- 19:11background, you could find the founder.
- 19:12But that never works. Like the number of
- 19:14times that if you if I make a rule where
- 19:16we only do second time founders or this
- 19:17and that, I can give examples that
- 19:18violates that rule. We just have to meet
- 19:20founders and then do our own evaluation
- 19:22of it. That is the most important part
- 19:23of the job. And we evaluate them by
- 19:25meeting them multiple times. We evaluate
- 19:27them by calling references and people
- 19:28that worked with them. But I'll give you
- 19:29a couple of examples of people in clean
- 19:31techch that I think are phenomenal.
- 19:33You've got most wellunded companies
- 19:34working on fusion come fusion systems
- 19:37founded by Bob Mumgard who's a plasma
- 19:39physicist. This is his first company.
- 19:41He's never worked at a company before.
- 19:42You know, if I told you to give me a
- 19:44resume for a CEO of a thousand person
- 19:47company, a plasma physicist is probably
- 19:48not what you would search for. But when
- 19:50you meet him, he is an operator. He has
- 19:52learned very quickly how to build a
- 19:54team, how to rely on others, how to tell
- 19:55a story, how to raise money. He is
- 19:57absolutely phenomenal. What a CEO needs
- 19:59to do is like describe in deep clarity
- 20:02the mission of the company and what's
- 20:03important and get a large number of
- 20:05people on board and focused in that
- 20:06direction and he does an exceptional
- 20:08job. And then you have people like Matt
- 20:10Rogers at Mill. This is his second
- 20:11company. His first company was Nest and
- 20:13he was sort of great along the way but
- 20:14he didn't rest in his own laurels. He
- 20:16did what great founders do which is
- 20:18build a great team around him. What we
- 20:20look for in founders is, you know, the
- 20:21job of building a company is solving
- 20:24hard problems that no one's ever solved
- 20:25before that you don't actually totally
- 20:26know how to solve. And so when we met
- 20:28Mill, they said, "Oh, we're going to get
- 20:30approval from the US government to take
- 20:32this return food waste and turn it into
- 20:34chicken feed." And uh, you know, we're
- 20:36going to get it by X time. We're not
- 20:37exactly sure how to do it, but we're
- 20:38going to get it done. Like 2 or 3 months
- 20:40later, they're like, "Yep, we got it
- 20:40done. It's proofed. We're we're now
- 20:42doing it." And it's just like a series
- 20:43of like we're going to go after this
- 20:45problem and then we're going to go solve
- 20:46it. each individually are amazing, but
- 20:47as a team figure out how to go take down
- 20:50big problems. And that's the magic of a
- 20:51of a startup.